To win the everlasting reward, men must do the will of Christ as it is revealed in the New Testament. "[27] Tinsley pointed out that Jesus had in view acts of physical violence and robbery; but that "these are not to be taken literally. "[30] The viewpoint of this writer is also to the effect that these admonitions are hyperbolic for the purpose of emphasis, the meaning being that the principles of non-resistance to evil, submission to wrongs, and refraining from retaliation should be honored by Christians in whatever situation it is possible to do so. It has been alleged that Luke's emphasis in this passage is principally social; but this verse disproves such a view. Even the fullest possible compliance with all Jesus' commands does not earn or merit salvation, which in the last analysis rests upon the gracious mercy of God; but willful disobedience thwarts even that mercy. "[26] On "Give to every man" John Wesley made it "Give to every man `what thou canst spare!'" The Pharisees had already decided to kill Jesus (John 5:18); and here they were, on a sabbath day, laying a net to capture Jesus with the intent of killing him and yet THEY would allege sin against Jesus for healing a man on that same day. It is not indicated that Christ intended such an attitude to be maintained absolutely under all conditions. "Blessed are the persecuted for righteousness' sake." And it came to pass in these days, that he went out into the mountain to pray; and he continued all night in prayer to God. But woe unto you that are rich! One of the saddest things in any church is to see the same circle of friends entertaining themselves over and over without any regard to broadening the base of the relationship. [28] E. J. Tinsley, The Gospel according to Luke (Cambridge: The Cambridge University Press, 1969), p. 70. For example Gilmour suggested that "Luke took over the sermon much as it stood in `Q,' and Matthew expanded it. In their view, Jesus' disciples were guilty of "reaping" by plucking the ears, "threshing" by rubbing them in their hands, and "carrying burdens" by conveying the grains to the mouth. cit., p. 112. Even Ash writes that "their wrong was not theft,"[4] requiring the deduction that it was presumably something else; but the disciples did nothing wrong. Those only make sure work for their souls and eternity, and take the course that will profit in a trying time, who think, speak, and act according to the words of Christ. The generation to whom Jesus addressed this question were believers, but they were not doers of the Lord's will. It seems incredible that Christian scholars, in many cases, seem to be blind to the fact that both Christ and his disciples were totally innocent of these false charges. Ours is a generation which has accepted "faith only" as the "open sesame" of the gate of heaven; but "faith only" was not enough for the first generation that ever tried it; nor is it enough today. The doctrine of salvation by "faith only" was born during the Reformation when civilization was in the struggle and travail of rebirth from the deadness of the Dark Ages; but, in all ages, the philosophy of merely believing has had its practical adherents. Violation of the Saviour's law in this sector results in the establishment of cliques which are not Christian in any sense, and duplicates of which may be observed in every secular organization on earth. "The true sabbath rest," as Lamar said, "is found in him; it begins here in rest for the soul, and ends hereafter in the eternal rest."[8]. To divine regulations, the Pharisees had added dozens of others, resulting in the most ridiculous requirements. We may well be amazed, that the sons of men should be so wicked. Woe unto you, ye that laugh now! Luke 6 Commentary, One of over 110 Bible commentaries freely available, this commentary, by the leading authority in the Church of Christ, presents a verse level look at the Bible. Matthew Henry’s Bible Commentary (concise), Matthew Henry Bible Commentary (complete), California - Do Not Sell My Personal Information. Judas Iscariot ... On this apostle, see my Commentary on Matthew, Matthew 26:21,49; 27:3-10. "Had that not been the case, this James would have been more clearly identified as `the brother of Matthew'."[16]. See fuller comment on this in my Commentary on Matthew, Matthew 12:1-12. For each tree is known by its own fruit. Just found your commentary and read through the Luke 6:6-11 section. It should be clearly understood, then, that what Jesus was charged with violating was not God's word at all, but the legal doodlings of the Pharisees. (4) Jesus also taught that keeping the sabbath day "holy" was not intended to be fulfilled merely by what men did not do on that day, but by what they actually did. Luke 6 Resources - Multiple Sermons and Commentaries; Luke 6:6-11 Divine Truth Confronts Human Tradition - John MacArthur; Luke 6:6-11 When Jesus Stomps On Your Toes - Steven Cole; Parallel Passages - Words in bold not found in Luke. (2) He showed that "on the sabbath day the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are guiltless," and that "one greater than the temple" was among them (Matthew 12:5,6). But Jesus answering them said, “Have you not even read this, what David did when he was hungry, he and those who were with him: how he went into the house of God, took and ate the showbread, and also gave some to those with him, which is not lawful for any but the priests to eat?” And He said to them, “The So… Pressed down, shaken together ... etc. These were: Before leaving this, we note the pseudocon arising from Luke's attributing the question, "is it lawful to heal on the sabbath day?" Lu 6:1-5. II, p. 103. Or how canst thou say to thy brother, Brother, let me cast out the mote that is in thine eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Luke 6:29; Luke 6:31. A queen said, "Let them eat cake"; but Jesus said to the hungry, "Ye shall be filled." Matthew 12:9+ Departing from there, He went into their synagogue. [11] Albert Barnes, Notes on the New Testament (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Book House, 1954), Vol. It is not merely "the hated" who are blessed, but those who are hated because of their acceptance of the Son of man as Lord and Saviour. Chapter 6. Woe unto you, ye that are full now! Go to, To report dead links, typos, or html errors or suggestions about making these resources more useful use our convenient. The Golden Rule (Luke 6:31), as stated by Luke, is "As ye would that men should do to you, do ye also to them likewise."


Juglans Major Tree, Fatsia Japonica New Leaves Turning Black, Almond Oil Benefits, Haiku Submissions 2019, Canned Nacho Cheese Ingredients, Garnier Fructis Smoothing Treat 1 Minute Hair Mask Ingredients, Floyd Rose Original, Lympstone Village Station, ,Sitemap